↓ Skip to main content

A new method to detect event-related potentials based on Pearson’s correlation

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new method to detect event-related potentials based on Pearson’s correlation
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13637-016-0043-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Giroldini, Luciano Pederzoli, Marco Bilucaglia, Simone Melloni, Patrizio Tressoldi

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) are widely used in brain-computer interface applications and in neuroscience.  Normal EEG activity is rich in background noise, and therefore, in order to detect ERPs, it is usually necessary to take the average from multiple trials to reduce the effects of this noise.  The noise produced by EEG activity itself is not correlated with the ERP waveform and so, by calculating the average, the noise is decreased by a factor inversely proportional to the square root of N, where N is the number of averaged epochs. This is the easiest strategy currently used to detect ERPs, which is based on calculating the average of all ERP's waveform, these waveforms being time- and phase-locked.  In this paper, a new method called GW6 is proposed, which calculates the ERP using a mathematical method based only on Pearson's correlation. The result is a graph with the same time resolution as the classical ERP and which shows only positive peaks representing the increase-in consonance with the stimuli-in EEG signal correlation over all channels.  This new method is also useful for selectively identifying and highlighting some hidden components of the ERP response that are not phase-locked, and that are usually hidden in the standard and simple method based on the averaging of all the epochs.  These hidden components seem to be caused by variations (between each successive stimulus) of the ERP's inherent phase latency period (jitter), although the same stimulus across all EEG channels produces a reasonably constant phase. For this reason, this new method could be very helpful to investigate these hidden components of the ERP response and to develop applications for scientific and medical purposes. Moreover, this new method is more resistant to EEG artifacts than the standard calculations of the average and could be very useful in research and neurology.  The method we are proposing can be directly used in the form of a process written in the well-known Matlab programming language and can be easily and quickly written in any other software language.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Algeria 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 24%
Neuroscience 12 16%
Computer Science 9 12%
Psychology 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2016.
All research outputs
#19,962,154
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
#32
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,570
of 355,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.