↓ Skip to main content

Principal component analysis based unsupervised feature extraction applied to budding yeast temporally periodic gene expression

Overview of attention for article published in BioData Mining, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Principal component analysis based unsupervised feature extraction applied to budding yeast temporally periodic gene expression
Published in
BioData Mining, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13040-016-0101-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Y-h Taguchi

Abstract

The recently proposed principal component analysis (PCA) based unsupervised feature extraction (FE) has successfully been applied to various bioinformatics problems ranging from biomarker identification to the screening of disease causing genes using gene expression/epigenetic profiles. However, the conditions required for its successful use and the mechanisms involved in how it outperforms other supervised methods is unknown, because PCA based unsupervised FE has only been applied to challenging (i.e. not well known) problems. In this study, PCA based unsupervised FE was applied to an extensively studied organism, i.e., budding yeast. When applied to two gene expression profiles expected to be temporally periodic, yeast metabolic cycle (YMC) and yeast cell division cycle (YCDC), PCA based unsupervised FE outperformed simple but powerful conventional methods, with sinusoidal fitting with regards to several aspects: (i) feasible biological term enrichment without assuming periodicity for YMC; (ii) identification of periodic profiles whose period was half as long as the cell division cycle for YMC; and (iii) the identification of no more than 37 genes associated with the enrichment of biological terms related to cell division cycle for the integrated analysis of seven YCDC profiles, for which sinusoidal fittings failed. The explantation for differences between methods used and the necessary conditions required were determined by comparing PCA based unsupervised FE with fittings to various periodic (artificial, thus pre-defined) profiles. Furthermore, four popular unsupervised clustering algorithms applied to YMC were not as successful as PCA based unsupervised FE. PCA based unsupervised FE is a useful and effective unsupervised method to investigate YMC and YCDC. This study identified why the unsupervised method without pre-judged criteria outperformed supervised methods requiring human defined criteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Researcher 3 19%
Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Computer Science 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#13,474,769
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#187
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,895
of 352,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.