↓ Skip to main content

Validation and reproducibility of a new iodine specific food frequency questionnaire for assessing iodine intake in Norwegian pregnant women

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation and reproducibility of a new iodine specific food frequency questionnaire for assessing iodine intake in Norwegian pregnant women
Published in
Nutrition Journal, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12937-019-0489-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Synnøve Næss, Inger Aakre, Marian Kjellevold, Lisbeth Dahl, Ive Nerhus, Lisa Kolden Midtbø, Maria Wik Markhus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Unspecified 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 21 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Unspecified 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 21 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#13,624,824
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,032
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,328
of 363,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.