Fake News Affecting the Adherence of National Response Measures During the COVID-19 Lockdown Period: The Experience of Vietnam
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2020
Thao Thi Phuong Nguyen, Duy Cao Nguyen, Anh Trong Tung Nguyen, Long Hoang Nguyen, Giang Thu Vu, Cuong Tat Nguyen, Trang Ha Nguyen, Huong Thi Le
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||50%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||6||14%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||7%|
|Student > Master||3||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||6||14%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||7%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||5%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
of 10,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 408,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.