↓ Skip to main content

Fake News Affecting the Adherence of National Response Measures During the COVID-19 Lockdown Period: The Experience of Vietnam

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Fake News Affecting the Adherence of National Response Measures During the COVID-19 Lockdown Period: The Experience of Vietnam
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.589872
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thao Thi Phuong Nguyen, Duy Cao Nguyen, Anh Trong Tung Nguyen, Long Hoang Nguyen, Giang Thu Vu, Cuong Tat Nguyen, Trang Ha Nguyen, Huong Thi Le

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,426,298
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,135
of 10,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,552
of 408,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#99
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.