You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Utilization of multiple microbial tools to evaluate efficacy of restoration strategies to improve recreational water quality at a Lake Michigan Beach (Racine, WI)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Microbiological Methods, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.106049 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Kinzelman, M.N. Byappanahalli, M.B. Nevers, D. Shively, S. Kurdas, C. Nakatsu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#1,683
of 2,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,301
of 424,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.