↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotics for treating lower urinary tract infection in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotics for treating lower urinary tract infection in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006857.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Fitzgerald, Rintaro Mori, Monica Lakhanpaul, Kjell Tullus

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections in infants and children. Lower UTI is the most commonly presenting and in the majority of cases can be easily treated with a course of antibiotic therapy with no further complications. A number of antimicrobials have been used to treat children with lower UTIs; however is it unclear what are the specific benefits and harms of such treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 1%
Macao 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 195 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Other 22 11%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 57 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 67 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,216,366
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,839
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,674
of 186,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.