↓ Skip to main content

Construction of a high-density genetic map for grape using next generation restriction-site associated DNA sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Construction of a high-density genetic map for grape using next generation restriction-site associated DNA sequencing
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-12-148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nian Wang, Linchuan Fang, Haiping Xin, Lijun Wang, Shaohua Li

Abstract

Genetic mapping and QTL detection are powerful methodologies in plant improvement and breeding. Construction of a high-density and high-quality genetic map would be of great benefit in the production of superior grapes to meet human demand. High throughput and low cost of the recently developed next generation sequencing (NGS) technology have resulted in its wide application in genome research. Sequencing restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) might be an efficient strategy to simplify genotyping. Combining NGS with RAD has proven to be powerful for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 154 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 29%
Researcher 42 26%
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Professor 5 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Unspecified 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 21 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2012.
All research outputs
#3,149,609
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#181
of 3,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,319
of 169,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.