You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Good practices for prone positioning at the bedside: Construction of a care protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1806-9282.62.03.287 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa Martins de Oliveira, Michele Elisa Weschenfelder, Gracieli Deponti, Robledo Condessa, Sergio Henrique Loss, Patrícia Maurello Bairros, Thais Hochegger, Rogério Daroncho, Bibiana Rubin, Marcele Chisté, Danusa Cassiana Rigo Batista, Deise Maria Bassegio, Wagner da Silva Nauer, Daniele Martins Piekala, Silvia Daniela Minossi, Vanessa Fumaco da Rosa dos Santos, Josue Victorino, Silvia Regina Rios Vieira |
| Abstract |
Last year, interest in prone positioning to treat acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) resurfaced with the demonstration of a reduction in mortality by a large randomized clinical trial. Reports in the literature suggest that the incidence of adverse events is significantly reduced with a team trained and experienced in the process. The objective of this review is to revisit the current evidence in the literature, discuss and propose the construction of a protocol of care for these patients. A search was performed on the main electronic databases: Medline, Lilacs and Cochrane Library. Prone positioning is increasingly used in daily practice, with properly trained staff and a well established care protocol are essencial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 39 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,778,730
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#146
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,811
of 353,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.