↓ Skip to main content

Good practices for prone positioning at the bedside: Construction of a care protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Good practices for prone positioning at the bedside: Construction of a care protocol
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, June 2016
DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.62.03.287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Martins de Oliveira, Michele Elisa Weschenfelder, Gracieli Deponti, Robledo Condessa, Sergio Henrique Loss, Patrícia Maurello Bairros, Thais Hochegger, Rogério Daroncho, Bibiana Rubin, Marcele Chisté, Danusa Cassiana Rigo Batista, Deise Maria Bassegio, Wagner da Silva Nauer, Daniele Martins Piekala, Silvia Daniela Minossi, Vanessa Fumaco da Rosa dos Santos, Josue Victorino, Silvia Regina Rios Vieira

Abstract

Last year, interest in prone positioning to treat acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) resurfaced with the demonstration of a reduction in mortality by a large randomized clinical trial. Reports in the literature suggest that the incidence of adverse events is significantly reduced with a team trained and experienced in the process. The objective of this review is to revisit the current evidence in the literature, discuss and propose the construction of a protocol of care for these patients. A search was performed on the main electronic databases: Medline, Lilacs and Cochrane Library. Prone positioning is increasingly used in daily practice, with properly trained staff and a well established care protocol are essencial.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Postgraduate 15 12%
Other 10 8%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 35 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 37 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,191,237
of 20,975,194 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#103
of 862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,387
of 274,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,975,194 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 862 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.