@Carborundu55651 @DrLorieF @Notyour28981739 Clearly it isn't posting those mistakes on purpose hence the retraction. https://t.co/lOe7kfyCs0
@filipe_rafaeli Talvez esse? https://t.co/qRXfYhVahC
@sauvagedavid75 @GromCris @Emma___Palmer Voici une étude avec 600mg. Pas d'effet significatif. https://t.co/dQfaorrOfM
@CKellyUAP HCQ as effective in plcebo im stopping covid https://t.co/pZrmtp99bu
@delasttours Tiens, lis ça et on en reparle après 😉 Etudes sur l'inefficacité de l'hydroxychloroquine : https://t.co/FquXGl0StY https://t.co/j9Xns12X6X https://t.co/AKi5xzrbYI https://t.co/U4gVGlXfs9
@brismich1 @mum89000 @MartinZ_uncut @aphm_actu 📌 Tang = https://t.co/PaohscBSi3 📌Chen (Jun) = https://t.co/3ErCJ0RoTP 📌Boulware (COVID-19 PEP) = https://t.co/UTDdVXrtEz 📌Ulrich = https://t.co/iSlxrkbgOV 📌Abella (PATCH = https://t.co/KHH92IXlg8 📌Barnab
@Zulu18360299 @rabah_larabi @LO974 Une efficacité a la limite de la significativité ca n'existe pas en science med. Soit ca a un benefice soit ca n'est pas le cas. Il y en a plein des RCT qui ne montrent aucune difference avec les controls. https://t.co/Yo
@filipe_rafaeli Uma metanálise só deve ser realizada no contexto de uma revisão sistemática. Assim fica fácil, né? Esqueceram de incluir esse estudo de Benjamin et al https://t.co/lKk1NYYQce
Tweeted this in Sept 2020. Disingenuous study published in JAMA IM, sample size too small, young healthy w no known exposure, terminated early w/o meeting enrollment goals, only 4 + PCRs, none sick, in each group, conclusion unjustified https://t.co/fpQ8a
@SallyVadar @4554Steevy Ummm.... no. Here are the related JAMA & NEJM papers from RCT's that demonstrate no benefit. And we're still 0-for-ever in terms of curing a viral infection. Prevention & treatment are all we have. https://t.co/UeYYflhUrc h
@Alterego238 @4554Steevy What about the highlighted section that states; "So HCQ functions as both a vaccine and a cure."? That looks like the author's claim to me. In any case, JAMA and NEJM both published papers related to studies that demonstrated no be
Did he forget the Viewpoint piece he co-authored in Nov 2020 during lead up to vaccines: https://t.co/UmtMr6FwOD. Where he references (6) deliberately undersized study https://t.co/7eqPr02vIN claiming HCQ doesn’t work. Dishonest argument using whatever bad
@AAPSonline Did he forget the Viewpoint piece he co-authored in Nov 2020 during lead up to vaccines: https://t.co/UmtMr6FwOD. Where he references (6) deliberately undersized study https://t.co/7eqPr02vIN claiming HCQ doesn’t work. Dishonest argument using
@KDMilhoanMD Did he forget the Viewpoint piece he co-authored in Nov 2020 during lead up to vaccines: https://t.co/UmtMr6FwOD. Where he references (6) deliberately undersized study https://t.co/7eqPr02vIN claiming HCQ doesn’t work. Dishonest argument using
@sudokuvariante @OsonsCauser @humanite_fr Etudes sur l'inefficacité de l'hydroxychloroquine : https://t.co/FquXGl0StY https://t.co/j9Xns12X6X https://t.co/AKi5xzrbYI https://t.co/U4gVGlXfs9 https://t.co/xeEufVzoA9 https://t.co/eIrP7nQZlJ https://t.co/hbTaI
@Mzz_Chelle @burgsey2 @Debsplace63 @CoachSteve11 @BethanyCherisse Both early and pre-exposure show no effect. Yawn. Facts: 1 McCullough: 0 https://t.co/x3Ib8oO0Xz
@LeMarkBR @Ricardo93212703 @brmatos @minerva_rafaela @LucianoHangBr Só fontes confiáveis quero ver estudos como estes; 1- https://t.co/EdxHKpZBL5 2-https://t.co/eBiMyPXjX3. 3-https://t.co/ssWw6sjl1h 4-https://t.co/71BKa9dWUK 5-https://t.co/qDqPYYhTEJ 6-htt
@marcellotoa @NicolasMauduit @Nain_Portekoi 📌Abella (PATCH = https://t.co/KHH92IXlg8 📌Barnabas= https://t.co/XpSOKQ7jdZ 📌Mitja (BCN PEP-COV2) = https://t.co/fhzGSS8wSy 📌Skipper (COVID-PEP) = https://t.co/gsTjgffNMa 📌Self (ORCHID)= https://t.co/MOPGlscU
@Malu45_RJ @freire_roberto "Que tal estudar, ler artigos sérios de médicos renomados no mundo" Todos dizem exatamente o que ele diz: não há eficácia do HCQ contra a COVID-19 -https://t.co/a6a7MuwYWT -https://t.co/J2kJDDH2Vz -https://t.co/NltMf3twXq
@Tsadqiell @Esban_ Etudes sur l'inefficacité de l'hydroxychloroquine : https://t.co/FquXGl0StY https://t.co/j9Xns12X6X https://t.co/AKi5xzrbYI https://t.co/U4gVGlXfs9 https://t.co/xeEufVzoA9 https://t.co/eIrP7nQZlJ https://t.co/hbTaIWOlXa https://t.co/nY2t
@OunetPik @r_cluz @CocoCocoCocoVi1 @clouzeau_b Etudes sur l'inefficacité de l'hydroxychloroquine : https://t.co/FquXGl0StY https://t.co/j9Xns12X6X https://t.co/AKi5xzrbYI https://t.co/U4gVGlXfs9 https://t.co/xeEufVzoA9 https://t.co/eIrP7nQZlJ https://t.co/
@r_cluz @Lspjerem @CocoCocoCocoVi1 @clouzeau_b sur l'inefficacité de l'hydroxychloroquine : https://t.co/FquXGl0StY https://t.co/j9Xns12X6X https://t.co/AKi5xzrbYI https://t.co/U4gVGlXfs9 https://t.co/xeEufVzoA9 https://t.co/eIrP7nQZlJ https://t.co/hbTaIWO
@wedietz @gorskon This was a small study and was halted early, but it was not found to prevent COVID. I'm trying to find the other I saw about treating COVID. But the results for placebo and HCQ were very similar. https://t.co/MYcKHQrRY5
@NaZa_on @LazzariAmbrogio @MGrecoMD @vadoaberlino @GiacomoGorini https://t.co/F6Kmd8eBi8 https://t.co/6vjfFRxt23 https://t.co/Xt6OtNx4M7 https://t.co/l46ArRAx26 giusto qualcuno, ma ne è piena la letteratura.
RT @carpe_diem0820: WHOはCOVID-19の予防にヒドロキシクロロキンを使用しないことを強く推奨 合計6000人以上を含む6つのRCTメタ解析で、HCQはCOVID-19に関連した死亡率や入院にはほとんど影響がないが、有害事象のリスク増加はある A l…
RT @carpe_diem0820: HCQの曝露前投与はプラセボと比較して、COVID-19 HRが、週1回投与群で0.72(95%CI 0.44~1.16、P=0.18)、週2回投与群で0.74(95%CI 0.46~1.19、P=0.22) 有意差無 Hydroxych…
RT @carpe_diem0820: COVID-19患者の診療にあたる医療従事者が暴露前予防としてヒドロキシクロロキンを8週間毎日服用しても、臨床的な有益性は認められなかった Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine vs Pla…
2. https://t.co/0LAQ4nX3Wv no difference (0.3%) 3. https://t.co/HNM3UohGnp better results for placebo 2/2
@lebel1886 @janestaller @TheEUEducator @FishInLake @yesisworld Because hydroxychloriquin turned out to be no more effective than placebo and better treatments were developed. https://t.co/kKcx4fyjQX
@glaco64 @AdventureKachu @Nunenthal •Tang https://t.co/PaohscBSi3 •Chen (Jun) https://t.co/3ErCJ0RoTP •Boulware (COVID-19 PEP) https://t.co/UTDdVXrtEz •Ulrich https://t.co/iSlxrkbgOV •Abella (PATCH) https://t.co/KHH92IXlg8 •Barnabas https://t.co/Xp
@HicaroDeCreta @ivanxiringa @Rconstantino Não funciona NEM SE VOCÊ COMEÇA A TOMAR COMO PROFILAXIA, ANTES DE PEGAR A DOENÇA https://t.co/p9PO5RDjjK
@SenadorHeinze Se você realmente está tentando se informar sobre o assunto, como afirmou hoje, LEIA: https://t.co/iTZ7GJTOzC https://t.co/PjVVtCMEYr https://t.co/dBbAt5swQe https://t.co/0VVSv3yXDD https://t.co/FIVNKCWVg8 PARE de ser um desinformado e des
@fabianogcreton @Adrieli_S https://t.co/uULzd6aQdz Esse aí compila estudos de vários continentes. https://t.co/lQQCVTCpFh Esse é Dr @BenjaminAbella https://t.co/3B5WneWgg7 Deixarei mais um de brinde pra ver como é FÁCIL ACHAR grandes estudos e tudin
@Joes94CrimeBill @MagChange_73 @JJuteux Essai clinique randomisé en double aveugle, contrôlé par placebo: "There was no clinical benefit of hydroxychloroquine administered daily for 8 weeks as pre-exposure prophylaxis in hospital-based HCWs exposed to pat
@Joes94CrimeBill @MagChange_73 @JJuteux Donc t'as pas de réponse? Aw, dommages lol La réponse est pourtant simple : pcq c'est inefficace, voilà. Lol @MagChange_73 me bombarde d'études, mais c'est même pas foutu de répondre à l'étude que j'ai fourni lmfao
RT @the_apex_dawn: @Joes94CrimeBill @VincentJappi @jlkBlackburn Essai clinique randomisé en double aveugle, contrôlé par placebo: "There w…
@Joes94CrimeBill @VincentJappi @jlkBlackburn Essai clinique randomisé en double aveugle, contrôlé par placebo: "There was no clinical benefit of hydroxychloroquine administered daily for 8 weeks as pre-exposure prophylaxis in hospital-based HCWs exposed t
@xnert It's a summary of all the studies he quotes and the problems with them - I thought you might be able to understand it. Send me the link to the JAMA. Can't find him but found other failed HCQ trials. https://t.co/Ns5AjTFfWs
@H_Ciloglu Randomize Kontrollü Bir Çalışma Hidroksiklorokinin COVID-19 Profilaksisinde Faydasız Olduğunu Gösterdi. #koronavirus #COVID19 Türkçe Özet : https://t.co/vf1itPhOew Orjinal : https://t.co/V53sAyNbJY
@UzunDr Randomize Kontrollü Bir Çalışma Hidroksiklorokinin COVID-19 Profilaksisinde Faydasız Olduğunu Gösterdi. #koronavirus #COVID19 Türkçe Özet : https://t.co/RDwLQa7BJ0 Orjinal : https://t.co/V53sAyNbJY
neste estudo, a administração diária de #hidroxicloroquina não apresentou benefício quando utilizada como profilaxia pré-exposição para profissionais de saúde expostos a pacientes com #covid19. #CPIdaCovid #CPIdaPandemia https://t.co/5MuSC5K8Wi
@ujualnarayan @drsimonegold Yeah it was done. It was done for mild disease. https://t.co/NzRZtN15Fn It was done for prophylaxis. https://t.co/fvhH9SMC3r No drug was as studied, with so many negative results. HCQ doesn’t work for Covid. End of story.
@JanainaDoBrasil E hidroxicloroquina não funciona nem como profilaxia https://t.co/p9PO5RUUbi
@AhoultA @MrZ70914564 @MRvdb @LehmannDrC Ben montrez nous en une ^^ https://t.co/aocehLemkt
@TrumpRussiaTies Thanks for reminding me to see how that worked out 👍 Surprise❗️🙂 "... there was no clinical benefit of hydroxychloroquine administered daily for 8 weeks as pre-exposure prophylaxis ..." https://t.co/oGrgxHcp6N
@Michel88631131 @detetivevsilva @mellziland @NatureComms https://t.co/xcoiEpMM5t Obviamente vc terá centenas de críticas sobre a metodologia e os resultados. Podemos fazer a mesma análise dos estudos observacionais que vc tanto gosta tbm.
@SimoneSantuelli @artioseaandsky @LaVeritaWeb Parlando di evidenze, il dott. Stramezzi sostiene l'efficacia dell'idrossiclorochina nella fase iniziale, finora non hanno fornito nessun dato a conferma, ma guardando i trial clinici non si vede alcun benefici
@francopavoni1 @powerpibio @LaVeritaWeb Ci sono anche trial effettuati nella fase iniziale (e ne sono in corso altri) o addirittura come profilassi, nessuno di questi ha rivelato una qualche utilità dell'idrossiclorochina contro Covid-19. https://t.co/7aU
@VladiNeri @ferrix88 @rrico_e @razorblack66 @AzzurraBarbuto Se parliamo, ad esempio, di idrossiclorochina somministrata nella fase iniziale nei trial clinici si è dimostrato che non funziona. I medici che sostengono che sia efficace dovrebbero portare le p
@Senescenza @ferrix88 @rrico_e @razorblack66 @AzzurraBarbuto Le "cure domiciliari" sostengono l'efficacia dell'idrossiclorochina somministrata nella fase iniziale. Nei trial clinici è dimostrato che il farmaco non ha alcun effetto benefico contro Covid-19.
@PCRucini1965 @pedro_piadaSoN @suruagymotta @Anamari36696337 @mariaftolentino Bah, obrigada! Deixo de tema de casa este artigo renomado: https://t.co/99qX6OCzPn Outros tu pode procurar, abraço!
@Eikour Ce ne sono per tutti i gusti. Tipo questo https://t.co/F5iPFO5cCC O questo https://t.co/sq9FrTg6xP Trattamento precoce, trattamento tardivo, mix dei due, profilassi, metanalisi, quello che volete. Non funziona mai. Saremmo tutti contenti SE funzion
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine vs Placebo for Pre-exposure SARS-CoV-2 Prophylaxis Among Health Care Workers…
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine vs Placebo for Pre-exposure SARS-CoV-2 Prophylaxis Among Health Care Workers…
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine vs Placebo for Pre-exposure SARS-CoV-2 Prophylaxis Among Health Care Workers…
Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine vs Placebo for Pre-exposure SARS-CoV-2 Prophylaxis Among Health Care Workers https://t.co/QxvFqbAIm7
RT @carpe_diem0820: WHOはCOVID-19の予防にヒドロキシクロロキンを使用しないことを強く推奨 合計6000人以上を含む6つのRCTメタ解析で、HCQはCOVID-19に関連した死亡率や入院にはほとんど影響がないが、有害事象のリスク増加はある A l…
RT @carpe_diem0820: WHOはCOVID-19の予防にヒドロキシクロロキンを使用しないことを強く推奨 合計6000人以上を含む6つのRCTメタ解析で、HCQはCOVID-19に関連した死亡率や入院にはほとんど影響がないが、有害事象のリスク増加はある A l…
RT @carpe_diem0820: WHOはCOVID-19の予防にヒドロキシクロロキンを使用しないことを強く推奨 合計6000人以上を含む6つのRCTメタ解析で、HCQはCOVID-19に関連した死亡率や入院にはほとんど影響がないが、有害事象のリスク増加はある A l…
RT @carpe_diem0820: WHOはCOVID-19の予防にヒドロキシクロロキンを使用しないことを強く推奨 合計6000人以上を含む6つのRCTメタ解析で、HCQはCOVID-19に関連した死亡率や入院にはほとんど影響がないが、有害事象のリスク増加はある A l…
RT @carpe_diem0820: WHOはCOVID-19の予防にヒドロキシクロロキンを使用しないことを強く推奨 合計6000人以上を含む6つのRCTメタ解析で、HCQはCOVID-19に関連した死亡率や入院にはほとんど影響がないが、有害事象のリスク増加はある A l…
WHOはCOVID-19の予防にヒドロキシクロロキンを使用しないことを強く推奨 合計6000人以上を含む6つのRCTメタ解析で、HCQはCOVID-19に関連した死亡率や入院にはほとんど影響がないが、有害事象のリスク増加はある A living WHO guideline on drugs to prevent covid-19 https://t.co/JjCeVOLMP9 https://t.co/cO19M03d6n
A double-blind random study indicating that Hydroxychloroquine had no effect on preventing exposure to COVID19. #getvaccinated #COVID19 #prevention #herdimmunity #vaccineswork #COVIDprevention #endcovid#wewillovercome #Vaccine #savelives #reduceexposure
@filipe_rafaeli Mais um estudo de profilaxia q foi suspenso por resultados desanimadores. "The trial was terminated early for futility before reaching a planned enrollment of 200 participants." https://t.co/rK98ZvuRUj
@christophewyns @Erik44187887 @LMucchielli •Abella (PATCH) https://t.co/KHH92IXlg8 •Barnabas https://t.co/XpSOKQ7jdZ •Mitja (BCN PEP-COV2) https://t.co/fhzGSS8wSy •Skipper (COVID-PEP) https://t.co/gsTjgffNMa •Self (ORCHID) https://t.co/MOPGlscUb3
#hidroxicloroquina Ni con 8 semanas como profilaxis en sanitarios da resultados.
Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine vs Placebo for Pre-exposure SARS-CoV-2 Prophylaxis Among Health Care... https://t.co/rXEslSsgmH via @JAMAInternalMed part of @JAMANetwork https://t.co/PprMzGMFR7 https://t.co/yuFNYu122b
クロロキンを医療従事者に予防投与しても新型コロナ感染を防げず、有害事象がやや多い、という報告。クロロキンは出る幕無し、って感じですね。 https://t.co/6FqEecCcHc @JAMAInternalMed part of @JAMANetworkより