↓ Skip to main content

Resource waves: phenological diversity enhances foraging opportunities for mobile consumers

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resource waves: phenological diversity enhances foraging opportunities for mobile consumers
Published in
Ecology, May 2016
DOI 10.1890/15-0554.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan B. Armstrong, Gaku Takimoto, Daniel E. Schindler, Matthew M. Hayes, Matthew J. Kauffman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 192 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 22%
Student > Master 35 18%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Researcher 23 12%
Professor 7 4%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 42 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 44%
Environmental Science 45 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 43 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,256,952
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#2,792
of 6,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,642
of 301,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#38
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.