↓ Skip to main content

Resource waves: phenological diversity enhances foraging opportunities for mobile consumers

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resource waves: phenological diversity enhances foraging opportunities for mobile consumers
Published in
Ecology, May 2016
DOI 10.1890/15-0554.1
Authors

Jonathan B. Armstrong, Gaku Takimoto, Daniel E. Schindler, Matthew M. Hayes, Matthew J. Kauffman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 26%
Student > Master 29 19%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Professor 6 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 51%
Environmental Science 38 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 20 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,922,899
of 17,919,784 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#2,414
of 6,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,022
of 268,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#40
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,919,784 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.