RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
@Rob_DeSchutter @ThijsBlom82 @PatrickAJansen @rcbregman Also I am a bit surprised that some degrowthers still claim that global economic growth is no longer needed. It seems fair to say that the west doesn't need economic growth. For the average human weal
RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
Parce que la décroissance ce n’est pas nécessairement la catastrophe…
RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
RT @JKSteinberger: I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards.…
I don't know why I bother any more, but we don't need (global) growth to provide everyone with decent living standards. We do, however, need to reduce inequality and wealth accumulation, massively. 1. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 2. https://t.co/GTzKbd1v0g 3. h
@Hank_Krill @PoliticOfNature Here, in the spirit of good faith I'll presume you just couldn't find the peer-reviewed article (and others): https://t.co/aR6fEdMoDV https://t.co/o0YucdeoEn https://t.co/0FJFUbuFtq https://t.co/n58Cfc5sD7 https://t.co/AY2hO
@Lundqvist_SLU @_biodavid_ "We find that global final energy consumption in 2050 could be reduced to the levels of the 1960s, despite a population three times larger." https://t.co/PjCeHWMoX4
@isitsugar @ExtinctionR @IPCC_CH 99.9% of the food we make is also not necessary. Feeding everyone and providing food like individually plastic wrapped twinkies every two miles are entirely different and one would require much less... everything https://t
@resourcerules @saleem_ali @theNASEM @NatGeo @KHayhoe @MBazilian @ICMM_com @EY_MiningMetals @Deloitte_Mining @mining @MiningWeekly @MiningOnline @SPGMI_Metals @NSF_CSSM @ISBAHQ @BMW Disturbing "research" for hire. It dangerously skews what is needed &
@LCoelembier @KCel65 @klimaatVeranda @crankyuncles U kent de talrijke scenario's met 100% duurzaam niet?? ✅ https://t.co/kLzb8lgiur ✅ https://t.co/lxOG1BEPHL ✅ https://t.co/JHPPPemsV1 ✅ https://t.co/X9JtlSmu9v ✅ https://t.co/LGVnXm5qmZ Etc. Etc.
@GarrettBroad @BurntOutUtopian @Unpop_Science As someone who advocates for GMO's, I'd ask you do the same. "such a world requires a massive rollout of advanced technologies across sectors, as well as radical demand-side changes to reduce consumption – rega
@ABoksebeld Pleaae check sources @DeSmog #followthemoney And https://t.co/X9JtlSmu9v
RT @ii_ecosocio: @davenportofcall Millward-Hopkins et al (2020) provide critical research on this point. A modest, modern standard of livin…
@davenportofcall Millward-Hopkins et al (2020) provide critical research on this point. A modest, modern standard of living w/ decent living energy is possible for all 10B humans. Now watch every ecomodernist alive stick their heads in the sand instead of
@mkampschreur @thiessenmark @Thom_her 1️⃣ vers van de pers, overzicht van denkrichtingen zoals @R_Degrowth @DoughnutEcon @betekenis_eco_: @Earth4All_ 2️⃣ de keiharde grenzen: https://t.co/X9JtlSmu9v 3️⃣ En nog een x: https://t.co/jW4ro9Hzzd 4️⃣ mijn twitt
@TomBryChevalier Par exemple: https://t.co/7ACzNZ96SA
RT @Klimaatzuster: @Breman_R @EllenCellarius @ProvOverijssel Wat een onzin. Kan prima zonder. Kernenergie is voor mensen die het geen prob…
RT @Klimaatzuster: @Breman_R @EllenCellarius @ProvOverijssel Wat een onzin. Kan prima zonder. Kernenergie is voor mensen die het geen prob…
RT @Klimaatzuster: @Breman_R @EllenCellarius @ProvOverijssel Wat een onzin. Kan prima zonder. Kernenergie is voor mensen die het geen prob…
RT @Klimaatzuster: @Breman_R @EllenCellarius @ProvOverijssel Wat een onzin. Kan prima zonder. Kernenergie is voor mensen die het geen prob…
@Breman_R @EllenCellarius @ProvOverijssel Wat een onzin. Kan prima zonder. Kernenergie is voor mensen die het geen probleem vinden om de mensheid met nóg meer problemen op te zadelen en de troep nóg groter te maken. Er zijn alternatieven zat. https://t.co
@_saintdrew To those that dismiss degrowth as a form of eco-austerity, as this journal article demonstrates, a globally sustainable decent standard of living could be provided to 10 billion people by 2050 through liberatory technologies and reducing consum
@gerbenbroekema @arjanerkel @xxxVeraGeexxx @GerritHiemstra Zegt nr 33 in de wereldwijde uitstoot top 100. We moeten NU de uitstoot stoppen. In de klimaatpsychologie noemen we dit projectie https://t.co/JSh34mtlph Meeste klimaateffect als rijken stoppen ht
@TheLastFarm This gives lower numbers but is a lower limit and is probably still more than the 75 to 80% reduction. https://t.co/0hJqcC5r7J
@picharbonnier Peut-être que la question peut se poser à l'envers. Quels sont les besoins essentiels que nous devons satisfaire et quelles sont les ressources requises (et émissions associées). @JKSteinberger et collègues ont des jolis papiers sur ça https
@99blackbaloons That's not true https://t.co/X9JtlSmu9v
@a_sator @APCC_SR_KfLeben Soll heißen, diese Wege gibt es nicht, wenn die SDGs mehr als ein Lippenbekenntnis sind und Grundbedürfnisse aller gedeckt werden sollen. z.B.: https://t.co/jYqzxmoFKA oder https://t.co/hdwDPV9yTB
RT @Warmetruiendag: @MPJNoordermeer @BM_Visser En u bent ook hoofdauteur van het IPCC? https://t.co/nJYo8WGjez Wetenschap is geen mening.…
@MPJNoordermeer @BM_Visser En u bent ook hoofdauteur van het IPCC? https://t.co/nJYo8WGjez Wetenschap is geen mening. En als u meer wilt weten over de inspanningen van de fossiele industrie om ons denken te beïnvloeden: het begon in NL ook in de kleuterkl
RT @JKSteinberger: @jdaviescoates @comunitarigene1 @MandaScott Hi J, these 4 articles are the basis I would say: https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW ht…
23/ O que si hai son aproximacións científicas, algunhas moi interesantes, como este artigo compartido hai pouco por @amturiel: https://t.co/MQsTHHcGTf
RT @JKSteinberger: @jdaviescoates @comunitarigene1 @MandaScott Hi J, these 4 articles are the basis I would say: https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW ht…
RT @JKSteinberger: @jdaviescoates @comunitarigene1 @MandaScott Hi J, these 4 articles are the basis I would say: https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW ht…
RT @JKSteinberger: @jdaviescoates @comunitarigene1 @MandaScott Hi J, these 4 articles are the basis I would say: https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW ht…
RT @JKSteinberger: @jdaviescoates @comunitarigene1 @MandaScott Hi J, these 4 articles are the basis I would say: https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW ht…
@jdaviescoates @comunitarigene1 @MandaScott Hi J, these 4 articles are the basis I would say: https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
RT @amturiel: @elmanyana @PauKokura @luisglezreyes Generalmente no entro a discutir con Eloy, pero dado que dice esto, pues bueno, ahí va u…
Lo suficiente con la mejor tecnología y la mayor igualdad 🎯@amturiel @bgomezpozo https://t.co/2XHmHRwzug
RT @amturiel: @elmanyana @PauKokura @luisglezreyes Generalmente no entro a discutir con Eloy, pero dado que dice esto, pues bueno, ahí va u…
RT @amturiel: @elmanyana @PauKokura @luisglezreyes Generalmente no entro a discutir con Eloy, pero dado que dice esto, pues bueno, ahí va u…
RT @amturiel: @elmanyana @PauKokura @luisglezreyes Generalmente no entro a discutir con Eloy, pero dado que dice esto, pues bueno, ahí va u…
RT @amturiel: @elmanyana @PauKokura @luisglezreyes Generalmente no entro a discutir con Eloy, pero dado que dice esto, pues bueno, ahí va u…
RT @amturiel: @elmanyana @PauKokura @luisglezreyes Generalmente no entro a discutir con Eloy, pero dado que dice esto, pues bueno, ahí va u…
RT @amturiel: @elmanyana @PauKokura @luisglezreyes Generalmente no entro a discutir con Eloy, pero dado que dice esto, pues bueno, ahí va u…
RT @amturiel: @elmanyana @PauKokura @luisglezreyes Generalmente no entro a discutir con Eloy, pero dado que dice esto, pues bueno, ahí va u…
@elmanyana @PauKokura @luisglezreyes Generalmente no entro a discutir con Eloy, pero dado que dice esto, pues bueno, ahí va uno entre muchos: https://t.co/mk5zRhy4Dq Y como bonus, otro muy interesante, sobre cosas que alguna vez hemos comentado pero que
RT @AirportWatch: Interesting paper on how it might be possible, with radical changes to the way societies & economies operate, including c…
Interesting paper on how it might be possible, with radical changes to the way societies & economies operate, including changes in aspirations & attitudes, for humanity to maintain a liveable climate into the future https://t.co/jvRwwEprb2 Lower st
@yamlima1 @Klimaatverbond @MinisterKenE @VNGemeenten @EnergieSamen @Ver_Hogescholen @eigenhuis @milieucentraal @MinOCW @RVO_Duurzaam @urgenda Ze is hoofdonderzoeker en IPCC auteur. Hoe verdeel je grondstoffen en energie eerlijk over straks 10 miljard mense
Do not trust the content of this paper. It claims we can all live sustainably in 2050 but declares the cost and emissions of the replacement of damn near every building on the planet to be "beyond our current scope." Nothing of practical utility contained
Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario. https://t.co/Goqgi23EWC
Degrowth / a response to the clichéd populist objection that environmentalists are proposing that we return to living in caves: Providing decent living with minimum energy A 🌏global scenario https://t.co/y2AO7sjEAw https://t.co/fepKyQ0p5d
@hausfath @AdvisorMikeL @Noahpinion Currently trying to resolve in my head "we need new tech to decarbonise what we'll keep doing" vs "we need fast/fair downshift of harmful economic activities & massive deployment of exist. tech". Could you clarify, d
RT @JKSteinberger: Some refs ... 1. https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 2. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 3. https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
essential reading kindly shared by stupendously-informed, Antonio Maria Turiel. #degrowth, or else…!
@princertitude Bien sûr, sauf qu'un vélomobile est 100 fois moins énergivore qu'un SUV, le pull 100 fois moins énergivore que la maison à 21°C et la tomate du potager 100 fois moins énergivore que celle de la serre. Toutes les solutions intermédiaires étan
@DanielGCabrero Por ejemplo, éste: https://t.co/mk5zRhy4Dq
Degrowth is pro-labor saving technologies, ya bad faith dweeb https://t.co/pMxVtpSXvj
@NotABigJerk https://t.co/uiuBTdXW0z Somebody posted this paper that calculates a minimum per capita energy use for a comfortable standard of living. People should talk about this instead of all that other vague bullshit
@MaurerHans @marhin @ReiSteurer Energie sparen ja? https://t.co/1VsQiYmaz8 https://t.co/aEk7nHqnBi
@Ihno @MikeNixda @Perowinger94 Warum sollten wir die betreiben sowie Millionen Tonnen Kohle noch fördern wenn wir ganz klar sparen können? https://t.co/og43qRthHv https://t.co/b6MUhtNF7c
@Leigh_Phillips We can reduce energy demand precipitously while ensuring a high standard of living for everyone. Engage with degrowth literature rather than screenshotting Twitter conversations. https://t.co/aR6fEdMoDV https://t.co/w02bsNxSYc
@rationalpeace1 @jacobin That would be valid if there were enough to 'level-up' everyone, but there isn't. Alternately, top 10% could shed 70% of their consumption and still have enough to live: https://t.co/cOTeY75l7Y
RT @JKSteinberger: Some refs ... 1. https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 2. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 3. https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
RT @JKSteinberger: Some refs ... 1. https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 2. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 3. https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
@KaiHeron @GreenGoesLeft @koheisaito0131 Which cites another paper when referring to transportation energy.... https://t.co/0hJqcC5r7J https://t.co/j5KZYDtpMc
RT @JKSteinberger: Some refs ... 1. https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 2. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 3. https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
RT @JKSteinberger: Some refs ... 1. https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 2. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 3. https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
RT @JKSteinberger: Some refs ... 1. https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 2. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 3. https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
RT @JKSteinberger: Some refs ... 1. https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 2. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 3. https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
RT @JKSteinberger: Some refs ... 1. https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 2. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 3. https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
RT @JKSteinberger: Some refs ... 1. https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 2. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 3. https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
RT @JKSteinberger: Some refs ... 1. https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 2. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 3. https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
Some refs ... 1. https://t.co/wYpgWAlUD2 2. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1 3. https://t.co/uWbXRHddez
@stebaraz @lucas_chancel Possiamo ridurre le emissioni e fornire a tutti una vita dignitosa - vedi studio sotto (@yl_oswald @JKSteinberger). Ma la domanda (politica) è: quante persone accetterebbero di cambiare il loro stile di vita in questo modo? https
@Qraaal @raymond_laser @sjowall69 Vous aurez mal lu. Il y a des gisements peu explorés de baisse matérielle et énergétique à faible baisse de confort. Voir le concept de suffisance. Exemple ici. https://t.co/8MspqwfyJg
Millward-Hopkins, Steinberger, Rao i Oswald wskazują, że do zapewnienia godnego poziomu życia dla wszystkich na Ziemi w 2050 r. wystarczyłaby nawet energia w ilości produkowanej w latach 60. XX wieku. https://t.co/bIoBZaa57L [6/7]
@HenryLootens @RobertsonSjoerd @stopsalderen @GEO_Jan @reservetrol @hans_koevoet @fossiltreaty @zonatlas @Polder_PV @Woonbond Huh heb ik gezegd dat we geen (duurzame) energie meer nodig hebben? Iedereen een Decent Living https://t.co/X9JtlSmu9v Zie ook ht
RT @Klimaatzuster: @jeroenwerner Vals dilemma. Bespaar! A. https://t.co/GbRwkU59D7 B. https://t.co/X9JtlSmu9v