↓ Skip to main content

Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
131 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science
Published in
British Medical Journal, July 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i3319
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene C Nelson, Mary Dixon-Woods, Paul B Batalden, Karen Homa, Aricca D Van Citters, Tamara S Morgan, Elena Eftimovska, Elliott S Fisher, John Ovretveit, Wade Harrison, Cristin Lind, Staffan Lindblad

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 131 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Master 21 16%
Other 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Computer Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 25 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#232,582
of 15,975,247 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#3,412
of 49,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,790
of 264,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#77
of 861 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,975,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 861 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.