↓ Skip to main content

Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
132 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science
Published in
British Medical Journal, July 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i3319
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene C Nelson, Mary Dixon-Woods, Paul B Batalden, Karen Homa, Aricca D Van Citters, Tamara S Morgan, Elena Eftimovska, Elliott S Fisher, John Ovretveit, Wade Harrison, Cristin Lind, Staffan Lindblad

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 19 19%
Unspecified 11 11%
Other 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 30 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 43%
Unspecified 17 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Computer Science 6 6%
Other 15 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#175,024
of 13,756,564 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#2,673
of 44,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,390
of 261,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#75
of 861 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,756,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 861 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.