↓ Skip to main content

Containment strategies for people with serious mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Containment strategies for people with serious mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002084.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudha Muralidharan, Mark Fenton

Abstract

The management of acutely disturbed people during periods of psychiatric crisis poses a particular challenge for mental health professionals. The challenge is to maintain safety while providing a safe and therapeutic environment. Non-pharmaceutical methods currently used to accomplish this include special observations, de-escalation, behavioural contracts and locking doors.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Israel 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 93 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Other 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 34%
Psychology 22 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 19%
Unspecified 11 11%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Other 6 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#687,572
of 12,358,097 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,942
of 8,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,629
of 126,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,358,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.