↓ Skip to main content

CARRS Surveillance study: design and methods to assess burdens from multiple perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CARRS Surveillance study: design and methods to assess burdens from multiple perspectives
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manisha Nair, Mohammed K Ali, Vamadevan S Ajay, Roopa Shivashankar, Viswanathan Mohan, Rajendra Pradeepa, Mohan Deepa, Hassan M Khan, Muhammad M Kadir, Zafar A Fatmi, K Srinath Reddy, Nikhil Tandon, KM Venkat Narayan, Dorairaj Prabhakaran

Abstract

Cardio-metabolic diseases (CMDs) are a growing public health problem, but data on incidence, trends, and costs in developing countries is scarce. Comprehensive and standardised surveillance for non-communicable diseases was recommended at the United Nations High-level meeting in 2011.Aims: To develop a model surveillance system for CMDs and risk factors that could be adopted for continued assessment of burdens from multiple perspectives in South-Asian countries.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 37%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 18 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2013.
All research outputs
#3,630,125
of 14,287,530 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,945
of 9,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,902
of 128,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,287,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them