RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
@kprather88’s research and her advocacy work to help the general public understand how Covid19 is transmitted inspired me to make this video. It’s actually very simple to understand. It’s the poor public health messaging that has confused the public. http
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
RT @kprather88: And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clear…
And why ignore a peer reviewed Letter to Science in October 2020 entitled "Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2" which clearly describes the difs in exposure pathways for inhalation of aerosols that float like smoke vs droplets which rapidly drop? https://
RT @jljcolorado: 25/ Ya sabíamos en 1934 que las gotas y aerosoles se separaban en 100 micras, y @ScienceMagazine lo ha vuelto a publicar h…
👇
@doctormacias Así es. La transmisión de ese y otros virus por vía aérea ya se conocía desde al menos 2020, pero los gobiernos no han dado suficiente difusión a ese crucial hecho. Cubrebocas N95, filtros HEPA para interiores, y ventilación adecuada pueden
RT @heidi_news: Kim Prather et ses confrères multiplient les articles sur la question, dont une lettre ouverte publiée en octobre 2020 dans…
RT @jmcrookston: 2020 OctScience Prather, Kimberly A, Linsey C Marr, Robert T Schooley, Melissa A McDiarmid, Mary E Wilson, and Donald K Mi…
RT @jmcrookston: 2020 OctScience Prather, Kimberly A, Linsey C Marr, Robert T Schooley, Melissa A McDiarmid, Mary E Wilson, and Donald K Mi…
There is overwhelming evidence that inhalation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) represents a major transmission route for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). 15.10.2020 👇✨️
RT @joaquinlife: "...droplets (> 100 µm)... fall to the ground in secs within 2 m of the source... because of limited travel range, physica…
RT @joaquinlife: "...droplets (> 100 µm)... fall to the ground in secs within 2 m of the source... because of limited travel range, physica…
RT @joaquinlife: "...droplets (> 100 µm)... fall to the ground in secs within 2 m of the source... because of limited travel range, physica…
RT @joaquinlife: "...droplets (> 100 µm)... fall to the ground in secs within 2 m of the source... because of limited travel range, physica…
RT @joaquinlife: "...droplets (> 100 µm)... fall to the ground in secs within 2 m of the source... because of limited travel range, physica…
RT @joaquinlife: "...droplets (> 100 µm)... fall to the ground in secs within 2 m of the source... because of limited travel range, physica…
RT @joaquinlife: "...droplets (> 100 µm)... fall to the ground in secs within 2 m of the source... because of limited travel range, physica…
RT @joaquinlife: "...droplets (> 100 µm)... fall to the ground in secs within 2 m of the source... because of limited travel range, physica…
"...droplets (> 100 µm)... fall to the ground in secs within 2 m of the source... because of limited travel range, physical distancing reduces exposure to these droplets... aerosols (< 100 µm) can remain... in the air for... secs to hours.., like smo
@dreamstiel @DEC0L0NIZE It's not a disingenuous comparison - it's the truth. Physical distancing is most useful for droplet transmission, while COVID spreads mostly through aerosols. Source: https://t.co/kL5M0tX4TI Your physical distancing does little to
RT @jmcrookston: 2020 OctScience Prather, Kimberly A, Linsey C Marr, Robert T Schooley, Melissa A McDiarmid, Mary E Wilson, and Donald K Mi…
RT @jmcrookston: 2020 OctScience Prather, Kimberly A, Linsey C Marr, Robert T Schooley, Melissa A McDiarmid, Mary E Wilson, and Donald K Mi…
RT @jmcrookston: 2020 OctScience Prather, Kimberly A, Linsey C Marr, Robert T Schooley, Melissa A McDiarmid, Mary E Wilson, and Donald K Mi…
Ask them to consider that COVID is airborne: https://t.co/SGdkUe1SPu
@60Minutes Important publication by @kprather88 in Science back in 2020. https://t.co/W8GlIxqeIf
RT @LazarusLong13: ✅ Airborne, with most transmission before symptoms. https://t.co/1GHENtp9WK ✅Mutating to produce more aerosols with la…
RT @LazarusLong13: ✅ Airborne, with most transmission before symptoms. https://t.co/1GHENtp9WK ✅Mutating to produce more aerosols with la…
✅ Airborne, with most transmission before symptoms. https://t.co/1GHENtp9WK ✅Mutating to produce more aerosols with later variants. https://t.co/XcSfZmuWMh ✅ It makes us forget how bad it was - or even if we had it. https://t.co/LXflZYMtMQ ✅ Establishe
RT @ProfEmer: The overwhelming and wide-ranging evidence of the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was summarised by various authors such…
RT @ProfEmer: The overwhelming and wide-ranging evidence of the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was summarised by various authors such…
RT @ProfEmer: The overwhelming and wide-ranging evidence of the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was summarised by various authors such…
RT @ProfEmer: The overwhelming and wide-ranging evidence of the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was summarised by various authors such…
RT @ProfEmer: The overwhelming and wide-ranging evidence of the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was summarised by various authors such…
RT @ProfEmer: The overwhelming and wide-ranging evidence of the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was summarised by various authors such…