↓ Skip to main content

High site fidelity does not equate to population genetic structure for common goldeneye and Barrow's goldeneye in North America

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Avian Biology, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High site fidelity does not equate to population genetic structure for common goldeneye and Barrow's goldeneye in North America
Published in
Journal of Avian Biology, December 2020
DOI 10.1111/jav.02600
Authors

Joshua I. Brown, Philip Lavretsky, Robert E. Wilson, Christy L. Haughey, W. Sean Boyd, Daniel Esler, Sandra L. Talbot, Sarah A. Sonsthagen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Lecturer 1 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Environmental Science 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,909,082
of 16,975,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Avian Biology
#453
of 1,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,456
of 319,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Avian Biology
#23
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,975,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.