↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of a wide gap between COVID-19 in humans and animal models: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of a wide gap between COVID-19 in humans and animal models: a systematic review
Published in
Critical Care, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03304-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salleh N. Ehaideb, Mashan L. Abdullah, Bisher Abuyassin, Abderrezak Bouchama

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 146 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Master 16 11%
Other 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 51 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,242,619
of 21,229,756 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,842
of 5,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,089
of 330,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,229,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them