↓ Skip to main content

A phase III randomized three-arm trial of physical therapist delivered pain coping skills training for patients with total knee arthroplasty: the KASTPain protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A phase III randomized three-arm trial of physical therapist delivered pain coping skills training for patients with total knee arthroplasty: the KASTPain protocol
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel L Riddle, Francis J Keefe, Dennis Ang, Khaled J, Levent Dumenci, Mark P Jensen, Matthew J Bair, Shelby D Reed, Kurt Kroenke

Abstract

Approximately 20% of patients report persistent and disabling pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) despite an apparently normally functioning prosthesis. One potential risk factor for unexplained persistent pain is high levels of pain catastrophizing. We designed a three-arm trial to determine if a pain coping skills training program, delivered prior to TKA, effectively reduces function-limiting pain following the procedure in patients with high levels of pain catastrophizing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 179 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 55 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 19%
Psychology 20 11%
Engineering 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 58 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,249,959
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,443
of 4,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,502
of 169,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#39
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.