You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Brain Tumor Discussions on Twitter (#BTSM): Social Network Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.2196/22005 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Josemari T Feliciano, Liz Salmi, Charlie Blotner, Adam Hayden, Edjah K Nduom, Bethany M Kwan, Matthew S Katz, Elizabeth B Claus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 24 | 52% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 17 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 57% |
Scientists | 12 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,320,247
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1,012
of 7,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,045
of 435,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#55
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.