↓ Skip to main content

A critical review to grading systems and recommendations of traditional Chinese medicine guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A critical review to grading systems and recommendations of traditional Chinese medicine guidelines
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12955-020-01432-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Li, Bin Li, Xin-ke Zhao, Jia-yin Tu, Yingdong Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,977,291
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,271
of 2,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,441
of 398,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#57
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.