↓ Skip to main content

Rationale and design of ePPOP-ID: a multicenter randomized controlled trial using an electronic-personalized program for obesity in pregnancy to improve delivery

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationale and design of ePPOP-ID: a multicenter randomized controlled trial using an electronic-personalized program for obesity in pregnancy to improve delivery
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12884-020-03288-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Deruelle, Sophie Lelorain, Sylvie Deghilage, Emmanuelle Couturier, Elodie Guilbert, Paul Berveiller, Marie Victoire Sénat, Christophe Vayssière, Loïc Sentilhes, Franck Perrotin, Denis Gallot, Céline Chauleur, Nicolas Sananes, Emmanuel Roth, Dominique Luton, Marie Caputo, Elodie Lorio, Carla Chatelet, Julien Couster, Oumar Timbely, Muriel Doret-Dion, Alain Duhamel, Marie Pigeyre

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 245 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Other 9 4%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 131 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 11%
Psychology 15 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 2%
Unspecified 6 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 137 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#18,093,540
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#3,398
of 4,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,957
of 414,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#80
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.