You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/d41586-020-02847-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niels Mejlgaard, Lex M. Bouter, George Gaskell, Panagiotis Kavouras, Nick Allum, Anna-Kathrine Bendtsen, Costas A. Charitidis, Nik Claesen, Kris Dierickx, Anna Domaradzka, Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Nicole Foeger, Maura Hiney, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Krishma Labib, Ana Marušić, Mads P. Sørensen, Tine Ravn, Rea Ščepanović, Joeri K. Tijdink, Giuseppe A. Veltri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 723 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 92 | 13% |
| United States | 59 | 8% |
| Spain | 30 | 4% |
| Ireland | 27 | 4% |
| Canada | 23 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 20 | 3% |
| France | 18 | 2% |
| Germany | 16 | 2% |
| India | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 140 | 19% |
| Unknown | 284 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 466 | 64% |
| Scientists | 192 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 27 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 15% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 20% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 34% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 608. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#37,898
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,319
of 98,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,392
of 437,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#116
of 858 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 858 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.