↓ Skip to main content

Genomic evidence for reinfection with SARS-CoV-2: a case study

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 6,102)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
714 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
899 Mendeley
Title
Genomic evidence for reinfection with SARS-CoV-2: a case study
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, October 2020
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30764-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard L Tillett, Joel R Sevinsky, Paul D Hartley, Heather Kerwin, Natalie Crawford, Andrew Gorzalski, Chris Laverdure, Subhash C Verma, Cyprian C Rossetto, David Jackson, Megan J Farrell, Stephanie Van Hooser, Mark Pandori

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9,293 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 899 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 899 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 118 13%
Student > Bachelor 114 13%
Student > Master 91 10%
Other 69 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 7%
Other 174 19%
Unknown 272 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 185 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 112 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 59 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 4%
Other 163 18%
Unknown 306 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10435. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#170
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#3
of 6,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13
of 438,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.