Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world
Royal Society Open Science, October 2020
Jon Roozenbeek, Claudia R. Schneider, Sarah Dryhurst, John Kerr, Alexandra L. J. Freeman, Gabriel Recchia, Anne Marthe van der Bles, Sander van der Linden
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,013 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||719||71%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||47||5%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||37||4%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 987 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||118||12%|
|Student > Master||114||12%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||100||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||44||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||87||9%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||36||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2548. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,503,201 outputs
Outputs from Royal Society Open Science
of 4,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 421,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Royal Society Open Science
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,503,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.