Title |
Improvdent: Improving dentures for patient benefit. A crossover randomised clinical trial comparing impression materials for complete dentures
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Oral Health, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6831-12-37 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Janine C Gray, Nuria Navarro-Coy, Sue H Pavitt, Claire Hulme, Mary Godfrey, Helen L Craddock, Paul A Brunton, Sarah Brown, Sean Dillon, Gillian Dukanovic, Catherine Fernandez, Jonathan Wright, Howard Collier, Shirley Swithenbank, Carol Lee, T Paul Hyde |
Abstract |
According to the UK Adult Dental Health Survey (2009) 15% of adults aged 65-74, 30% aged 75-84 and 47% aged >85 years are edentulous and require complete dentures. Patients' quality of life and nutrition status are affected by poor dentures. The quality of the dental impression is the most important issue for improving the fit and comfort of new dentures. There is paucity of RCT evidence for which impression material is best for complete dentures construction. This study aims to compare two impression materials for effectiveness and cost effectiveness. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
Researcher | 7 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 18% |
Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 46% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Psychology | 3 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 38 | 31% |