↓ Skip to main content

Normalization of a chromosomal contact map

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Normalization of a chromosomal contact map
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-436
Pubmed ID
Authors

Axel Cournac, Hervé Marie-Nelly, Martial Marbouty, Romain Koszul, Julien Mozziconacci

Abstract

Chromatin organization has been increasingly studied in relation with its important influence on DNA-related metabolic processes such as replication or regulation of gene expression. Since its original design ten years ago, capture of chromosome conformation (3C) has become an essential tool to investigate the overall conformation of chromosomes. It relies on the capture of long-range trans and cis interactions of chromosomal segments whose relative proportions in the final bank reflect their frequencies of interactions, hence their spatial proximity in a population of cells. The recent coupling of 3C with deep sequencing approaches now allows the generation of high resolution genome-wide chromosomal contact maps. Different protocols have been used to generate such maps in various organisms. This includes mammals, drosophila and yeast. The massive amount of raw data generated by the genomic 3C has to be carefully processed to alleviate the various biases and byproducts generated by the experiments. Our study aims at proposing a simple normalization procedure to minimize the influence of these unwanted but inevitable events on the final results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 190 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 36%
Researcher 46 22%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Professor 11 5%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 15 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 28%
Computer Science 14 7%
Mathematics 6 3%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 22 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,215,731
of 24,985,232 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,604
of 11,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,245
of 176,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#19
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,985,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.