↓ Skip to main content

Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore counts

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore counts
Published in
Plant Methods, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-8-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralf Weßling, Ralph Panstruga

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
India 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 35%
Researcher 26 25%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 85%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Engineering 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 4 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,335,441
of 11,794,580 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#168
of 438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,353
of 116,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,794,580 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.