↓ Skip to main content

Digital rectal examination skills: first training experiences, the motives and attitudes of standardized patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digital rectal examination skills: first training experiences, the motives and attitudes of standardized patients
Published in
BMC Medical Education, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0292-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Nikendei, Katja Diefenbacher, Nadja Köhl-Hackert, Heike Lauber, Julia Huber, Anne Herrmann-Werner, Wolfgang Herzog, Jobst-Hendrik Schultz, Jana Jünger, Markus Krautter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Psychology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,707,469
of 24,366,830 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#433
of 3,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,894
of 361,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#10
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,366,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.