You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003248.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heike Rabe, Jose Luis Diaz‐Rossello, Lelia Duley, Therese Dowswell |
Abstract |
Optimal timing for clamping the umbilical cord at preterm birth is unclear. Early clamping allows for immediate transfer of the infant to the neonatologist. Delaying clamping allows blood flow between the placenta, the umbilical cord and the baby to continue. The blood which transfers to the baby between birth and cord clamping is called placental transfusion. Placental transfusion may improve circulating volume at birth, which may in turn improve outcome for preterm infants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 31% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
Australia | 2 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 81% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 446 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 431 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 81 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 63 | 14% |
Researcher | 55 | 12% |
Other | 49 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 8% |
Other | 90 | 20% |
Unknown | 72 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 227 | 51% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 3% |
Psychology | 13 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
Other | 34 | 8% |
Unknown | 85 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2023.
All research outputs
#403,468
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#701
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,976
of 186,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.