↓ Skip to main content

European guidelines on management of restless legs syndrome: report of a joint task force by the European Federation of Neurological Societies, the European Neurological Society and the European…

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Neurology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
European guidelines on management of restless legs syndrome: report of a joint task force by the European Federation of Neurological Societies, the European Neurological Society and the European Sleep Research Society
Published in
European Journal of Neurology, December 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03853.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Garcia-Borreguero, Luigi Ferini-Strambi, Ralf Kohnen, Shaun O'Keeffe, Claudia Trenkwalder, Birgit Högl, Heike Benes, Poul Jennum, Markku Partinen, Danyal Fer, Pasquale Montagna, Claudio L. Bassetti, Alex Iranzo, Karel Sonka, Anne-Marie Williams

Abstract

Since the publication of the first European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) guidelines in 2005 on the management of restless legs syndrome (RLS; also known as Willis-Ekbom disease), there have been major therapeutic advances in the field. Furthermore, the management of RLS is now a part of routine neurological practice in Europe. New drugs have also become available, and further randomized controlled trials have been undertaken. These guidelines were undertaken by the EFNS in collaboration with the European Neurological Society and the European Sleep Research Society.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 99 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Other 19 18%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 66%
Neuroscience 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 15 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2012.
All research outputs
#6,482,010
of 12,348,046 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Neurology
#1,009
of 2,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,539
of 123,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Neurology
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,348,046 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.