↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting the un/ethical: the complex ethics of elite studies research

Overview of attention for article published in Qualitative Research, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Revisiting the un/ethical: the complex ethics of elite studies research
Published in
Qualitative Research, October 2020
DOI 10.1177/1468794120965361
Authors

Karen Lillie, Pere Ayling

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 50%
Linguistics 1 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,373,790
of 16,258,438 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Research
#213
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,436
of 308,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Research
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,258,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.