RT @DrX_ADunlap: @SabahetaRamilo1 @sambutlerUS @PoliticOfNature Does this help: https://t.co/OvgAI799mQ
@SabahetaRamilo1 @sambutlerUS @PoliticOfNature Does this help: https://t.co/OvgAI799mQ
14/n La critique de Clive Spash, à propos d'une version faible de la décroissance qui est seulement "agnostique à propos de la croissance" et ne remet pas vraiment en question le capitalisme https://t.co/5eRuQVd43J
RT @Phil_Free_: “That environmental problems are an all pervasive part of modern economic systems is a lesson of ecological economics based…
“That environmental problems are an all pervasive part of modern economic systems is a lesson of ecological economics based on the laws of thermodynamics & conservation of matter.” Apologists for growth: passive revolutionaries in a passive revolution
"Apologists for growth: passive revolutionaries in a passive revolution" https://t.co/SrIQXM0gix Clive Spash takes aim at @KateRaworth for being agnostic on growth & @ProfTimJackson for supporting growth for social development.
@ErnstKuiper @janrotmans Over de problemen van 'laten we niet zo dogmatisch doen over wel of geen groei': https://t.co/E2iHqmfh7v
RT @Phil_Free_: “Keynes: We shall be able to rid ourselves of many of the pseudo-moral principles which have hag-ridden us for 200yrs, by w…
@fuspey @timparrique @PresidentIRL @transitiontowns @SteadyStateEcon Personally I find there is always the issue of considering (or ignoring) the political economy of capitalism and its implications. Clive Spash wrote something great about that in my opini
RT @R_Degrowth: 'New Economy'? 2 problematic positions: 1) being pro-growth while seeking to change d current form of capitalism 2) bein…
RT @Phil_Free_: “The top down approach to diverting attention away from the need for systems change is something Gramsci referred to as a ‘…
“The top down approach to diverting attention away from the need for systems change is something Gramsci referred to as a ‘passive revolution’. This relates to the passive integration of subordinate segments of society while keeping them powerless.” https:
RT @BenRobra: Yes, yes and yes! Thank you Clive Spash! When criticising growth economies the capitalist system also needs to be criticised…
RT @agrohacker: Raworth's recipe "leaves power relations undisturbed and the economic structure fundamentally unchanged." Clive Spash https…
RT @agrohacker: Raworth's recipe "leaves power relations undisturbed and the economic structure fundamentally unchanged." Clive Spash https…
RT @agrohacker: Raworth's recipe "leaves power relations undisturbed and the economic structure fundamentally unchanged." Clive Spash https…
RT @agrohacker: Raworth's recipe "leaves power relations undisturbed and the economic structure fundamentally unchanged." Clive Spash https…
RT @agrohacker: Raworth's recipe "leaves power relations undisturbed and the economic structure fundamentally unchanged." Clive Spash https…
RT @agrohacker: Raworth's recipe "leaves power relations undisturbed and the economic structure fundamentally unchanged." Clive Spash https…
Raworth's recipe "leaves power relations undisturbed and the economic structure fundamentally unchanged." Clive Spash https://t.co/8Afh3CdwCT #NewPower: "The ability to harness the connected crowd 2 get what you want". "The new 'movement' bible for capita
La receta de la economista de Oxford Kate Raworth, muy atractiva y popular (Amsterdam dice que la aplicará p.ej), queda relegada tras la acertada crítica de Spash: "leaves power relations undisturbed and the economic structure fundamentally unchanged": htt
RT @Phil_Free_: “Keynes: We shall be able to rid ourselves of many of the pseudo-moral principles which have hag-ridden us for 200yrs, by w…
“Keynes: We shall be able to rid ourselves of many of the pseudo-moral principles which have hag-ridden us for 200yrs, by which we have exalted some of the most distasteful of human qualities into the position of the highest virtues.” https://t.co/wZPqKN6h
RT @Phil_Free_: “The basics physical, social, economic & psychological criticisms of the resulting economic system have never been addresse…
“The basics physical, social, economic & psychological criticisms of the resulting economic system have never been addressed.” Apologists for growth: passive revolutionaries in a passive revolution https://t.co/gAlaYkUUHn
RT @Phil_Free_: “The top-down approach to diverting attention from the need for systems change is something Gramsci referred to as a ‘passi…
“Two problematic positions are revealed:being pro-growth while seeking to change the current form of capitalism(e.g. Ha-Joon Chang),and being anti-growth on environmental grounds but promoting growth for poverty alleviation and due to agnosticism about gro
[article] Apologists for Growth: Passive Revolutionaries in a Passive Revolution (Clive L. Spash) https://t.co/7IsT1rf7ML
RT @Ay24833632: Çünkü servet dağılımını düzeltmek "zor" (!) Teknolojik ilerleme kastırarak çözmeye çalışıyor iyi niyetli bilim dünyası... a…
RT @BenRobra: Yes, yes and yes! Thank you Clive Spash! When criticising growth economies the capitalist system also needs to be criticised…
“The top-down approach to diverting attention from the need for systems change is something Gramsci referred to as a ‘passive revolution’. This relates to the passive integration of subordinate segments of society while keeping them powerless.” https://t.c
Çünkü servet dağılımını düzeltmek "zor" (!) Teknolojik ilerleme kastırarak çözmeye çalışıyor iyi niyetli bilim dünyası... ad infinitum.
Here the idea that economic growth and development can exist synonymously with a sustainable environment is broken down. https://t.co/s4v6RTKwrG
Radical thinking is requested for understanding radical problems
being pro-growth while seeking to change the current form of capitalism/Chang),being anti-growth on environmental grounds but promoting growth for poverty alleviation and due to agnosticism about growth (Raworth). Both positions involve contradictions htt
@alastairmci @IPCC_CH @BirlinnBooks Some more food for thought in this recent paper by Clive Spash. Apologists for growth: Passive revolutionaries in a passive revolution. https://t.co/SxKuOArIDM
RT @BenRobra: Yes, yes and yes! Thank you Clive Spash! When criticising growth economies the capitalist system also needs to be criticised…
RT @BenRobra: Yes, yes and yes! Thank you Clive Spash! When criticising growth economies the capitalist system also needs to be criticised…
RT @BenRobra: Yes, yes and yes! Thank you Clive Spash! When criticising growth economies the capitalist system also needs to be criticised…
RT @BenRobra: Yes, yes and yes! Thank you Clive Spash! When criticising growth economies the capitalist system also needs to be criticised…
RT @BenRobra: Yes, yes and yes! Thank you Clive Spash! When criticising growth economies the capitalist system also needs to be criticised…
RT @BenRobra: Yes, yes and yes! Thank you Clive Spash! When criticising growth economies the capitalist system also needs to be criticised…
RT @BenRobra: Yes, yes and yes! Thank you Clive Spash! When criticising growth economies the capitalist system also needs to be criticised…
Yes, yes and yes! Thank you Clive Spash! When criticising growth economies the capitalist system also needs to be criticised. This should be required literature for everyone 👇 https://t.co/3N8IjFCG51 #degrowth
RT @R_Degrowth: 'New Economy'? 2 problematic positions: 1) being pro-growth while seeking to change d current form of capitalism 2) bein…
RT @R_Degrowth: 'New Economy'? 2 problematic positions: 1) being pro-growth while seeking to change d current form of capitalism 2) bein…
RT @R_Degrowth: 'New Economy'? 2 problematic positions: 1) being pro-growth while seeking to change d current form of capitalism 2) bein…
RT @R_Degrowth: 'New Economy'? 2 problematic positions: 1) being pro-growth while seeking to change d current form of capitalism 2) bein…
RT @R_Degrowth: 'New Economy'? 2 problematic positions: 1) being pro-growth while seeking to change d current form of capitalism 2) bein…
RT @R_Degrowth: 'New Economy'? 2 problematic positions: 1) being pro-growth while seeking to change d current form of capitalism 2) bein…
RT @R_Degrowth: 'New Economy'? 2 problematic positions: 1) being pro-growth while seeking to change d current form of capitalism 2) bein…
RT @R_Degrowth: 'New Economy'? 2 problematic positions: 1) being pro-growth while seeking to change d current form of capitalism 2) bein…
RT @R_Degrowth: 'New Economy'? 2 problematic positions: 1) being pro-growth while seeking to change d current form of capitalism 2) bein…
'New Economy'? 2 problematic positions: 1) being pro-growth while seeking to change d current form of capitalism 2) being anti-growth on environmental grounds but promoting growth 4 poverty alleviation & due to agnosticism about growth By Clive Spa