↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of FFPE-induced bacterial DNA damage and development of a repair method

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Methods and Protocols, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of FFPE-induced bacterial DNA damage and development of a repair method
Published in
Biology Methods and Protocols, July 2020
DOI 10.1093/biomethods/bpaa015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yensi Flores Bueso, Sidney P Walker, Mark Tangney

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 53%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,936,500
of 22,448,731 outputs
Outputs from Biology Methods and Protocols
#25
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,421
of 315,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Methods and Protocols
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,448,731 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them