↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19 relative to controls: An N=84,285 online study

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
84 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
2612 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
Title
Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19 relative to controls: An N=84,285 online study
Published in
medRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.10.20.20215863
Authors

Hampshire, Adam, Trender, William, Chamberlain, Samuel R, Jolly, Amy, Grant, Jon E., Patrick, Fiona, Mazibuko, Ndaba, Williams, Steve, Barnby, Joseph M, Hellyer, Peter, Mehta, Mitul A

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,612 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2369. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,408
of 16,663,134 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#64
of 15,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170
of 380,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#11
of 1,612 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,663,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,612 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.