↓ Skip to main content

Sofrimento psíquico e estresse no trabalho de agentes penitenciários: uma revisão da literatura

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 2,034)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sofrimento psíquico e estresse no trabalho de agentes penitenciários: uma revisão da literatura
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, July 2016
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015217.00502016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cláudia de Magalhães Bezerra, Simone Gonçalves de Assis, Patricia Constantino

Abstract

This article presents a review of literature based on a survey of national and international journals on psychological distress and stress in the work of correctional officers between 2000 and 2014. The databases used were the Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Web of Science, and Scopus, and the descriptors were psychological distress, stress and correctional officers. We analyzed 40 articles, mainly about stress. The concept of burnout appeared in several works. The United States is the country that most publishes on the subject. There is little interest about the subject in the journals of Public Health. In Latin America we found only four studies, all Brazilian. The number of publications has gradually intensified over the years, and there was methodological improvement in the development and assessment scales, mainly regarding stress and burnout. Work overload, lack of material and human resources, level of contact with the inmates, overcrowding, perceptions of fear or danger, and the paradox of punish / reeducate were some of the risk factors encountered, among others. The protective factors refer to social support within the prison environment, and the coping strategies are related to the improvement of officer training, stimulating social support, and offering psychological care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 34 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 39 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,953,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#42
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,696
of 367,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.