You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Constraint‐induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004433.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, Gatti R |
| Abstract |
In stroke patients, upper limb paresis affects many activities of daily life. Reducing disability is therefore a major aim of rehabilitation programmes for hemiparetic patients. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is a current approach to stroke rehabilitation that implies the forced use and the massed practice of the affected arm by restraining the unaffected arm. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 56 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 6% |
| Engineering | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,314,922
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,415
of 12,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,263
of 93,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.