The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparing DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Gene Amplification Methods for Plant-Associated Bacterial Communities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Phytobiomes Journal, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1094/pbiomes-07-20-0055-r |
Authors |
Cecelia Giangacomo, Mohsen Mohseni, Lynsey Kovar, Jason G. Wallace |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 13% |
South Africa | 2 | 8% |
Paraguay | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 42% |
Scientists | 10 | 42% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 19% |
Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 40 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 34% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 49 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#878,259
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Phytobiomes Journal
#30
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,036
of 534,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytobiomes Journal
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.