| Title |
Social selectivity in aging wild chimpanzees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aaz9129 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandra G Rosati, Lindsey Hagberg, Drew K Enigk, Emily Otali, Melissa Emery Thompson, Martin N Muller, Richard W Wrangham, Zarin P Machanda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 715 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 103 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 32 | 4% |
| Japan | 21 | 3% |
| Spain | 19 | 3% |
| France | 18 | 3% |
| Canada | 17 | 2% |
| Mexico | 12 | 2% |
| India | 12 | 2% |
| Italy | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 93 | 13% |
| Unknown | 378 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 524 | 73% |
| Scientists | 152 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 22 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 19% |
| Researcher | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 26% |
| Psychology | 22 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1849. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,426
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Science
#295
of 83,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267
of 442,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#17
of 995 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 995 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.