You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Where is the Hot Rock and Where is the Ground Water – Using CSAMT to Map Beneath and Around Mount St. HelensWynn et al.: Using CSAMT to Map Beneath Mount St. Helens in 3-D
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2113/jeeg21.2.79 |
| Authors |
Jeff Wynn, Adam Mosbrucker, Herb Pierce, Kurt Spicer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 27% |
| Researcher | 3 | 27% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 64% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 18% |
| Engineering | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics
#57
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,961
of 353,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them