↓ Skip to main content

Where is the Hot Rock and Where is the Ground Water – Using CSAMT to Map Beneath and Around Mount St. Helens

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Where is the Hot Rock and Where is the Ground Water – Using CSAMT to Map Beneath and Around Mount St. Helens
Published in
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, June 2016
DOI 10.2113/jeeg21.2.79
Authors

Jeff Wynn, Adam Mosbrucker, Herb Pierce, Kurt Spicer

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Student > Master 3 33%
Researcher 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 67%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,083,791
of 8,019,263 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics
#19
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,677
of 260,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,019,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them