The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 152 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||85||56%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||31||20%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||1%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||25%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||8||67%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
of 24,492,652 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Graduate Medical Education
of 1,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 417,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Graduate Medical Education
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,492,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.