↓ Skip to main content

Fragmented restrictions, fractured resonances: grassroots responses to Covid-19 in China

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Asian Studies, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Fragmented restrictions, fractured resonances: grassroots responses to Covid-19 in China
Published in
Critical Asian Studies, October 2020
DOI 10.1080/14672715.2020.1834868
Authors

Yao Song, Tianyang Liu, Xiangyang Wang, Tianru Guan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Lecturer 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,821,146
of 16,287,626 outputs
Outputs from Critical Asian Studies
#66
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,798
of 316,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Asian Studies
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,287,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.