↓ Skip to main content

Isolation of antimicrobial peptides from different plant sources: Does a general extraction method exist?

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Isolation of antimicrobial peptides from different plant sources: Does a general extraction method exist?
Published in
Plant Methods, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13007-020-00687-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna S. Barashkova, Eugene A. Rogozhin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 28 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 30 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,380,448
of 22,246,158 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#244
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,131
of 400,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#42
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,246,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.