↓ Skip to main content

Feeling angry: the effects of vaccine misinformation and refutational messages on negative emotions and vaccination attitude

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Communication, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,326)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feeling angry: the effects of vaccine misinformation and refutational messages on negative emotions and vaccination attitude
Published in
Journal of Health Communication, October 2020
DOI 10.1080/10810730.2020.1838671
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jieyu Ding Featherstone, Jingwen Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 48 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 22%
Psychology 12 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 51 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 347. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#80,206
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Communication
#6
of 1,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,598
of 420,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Communication
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.