↓ Skip to main content

ORCID Public Data File 2020

Overview of attention for research output published on figshare, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ORCID Public Data File 2020
Published on
figshare, October 2020
DOI 10.23640/07243.13066970
Authors

Blackburn, Rob, Cabral, Thamirys, Cardoso, Ana, Cheng, Estelle, Costa, Pedro, Demain, Paula, Demeranville, Tom, Dineen, Dan, Dumitru, C, Gopinath, Padma, Harley, Stephanie, Heredia, Ana, Hershberger, Sarah, Ho, T, Krznarich, Liz, Ksibi, Nabil, Kutrovska, Emilia, Lu, Camillia, Marin Arraiza, Paloma, Mejias, Gabriela, Mendoza, Leo, Minihan, Brian, Montenegro, Angel, George, Nash, Najafi-Gheidari, Mitra, Palafox, Daniel, Paparisto, Sandy, Petro, Julie Anne, Romanov, Andrej, Sadler, Shawna, Sherman, Bernette, Simpson, Will, Westbood, Giles, Willis, K, Wijnbergen, Ivo

Abstract

These files contain a snapshot of all public data in the ORCID Registry associated with an ORCID record that was created or claimed by an individual as of October 1st, 2020. ORCID publishes this file once per year under a Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal public domain dedication. This means that, to the extent possible under law, ORCID has waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to the Public Data File. For more information on the file, see https://orcid.org/content/orcid-public-data-file-use-policyThe file contains the public information associated with each user's ORCID record. The data is available in XML format and is further divided into separate files for easier management. One file contains the full record summary for each record. The rest of the data is divided into 11 files which contain the activities for each record including full work data.Below is more complete description of how the data is structured.Summaries fileName: ORCID_2020_10_summaries.tar.gzDescription: Contains all the existing summaries, when extracted, it will generate the following file structure: summaries/[3 digits checksum]/[iD].xmlExample: If you are looking for the summary of iD '0000-0002-7869-831X', decompress the file and you will find the summary under 'summaries/31X/0000-0002-7869-831X.xml'.Activities filesNamed: - ORCID_2020_10_activites_0.tar.gz - ORCID_2020_10_activites_1.tar.gz - ORCID_2020_10_activites_2.tar.gz - ORCID_2020_10_activites_3.tar.gz - ORCID_2020_10_activites_4.tar.gz - ORCID_2020_10_activites_5.tar.gz - ORCID_2020_10_activites_6.tar.gz - ORCID_2020_10_activites_7.tar.gz - ORCID_2020_10_activites_8.tar.gz - ORCID_2020_10_activites_9.tar.gz - ORCID_2020_10_activites_X.tar.gzDescription: Consists of 11 .tar.gz files, each file contains the public activities that belongs to an iD that contains a given checksum. The file hierarchy is as follows: [checksum]/[3 digits checksum]/[iD]/[activity type]/[iD]_[activity_type]_[putcode].xmlExamples: If you are looking for the public activities that belong to `0000-0002-7869-831X: Decompress the file 'ORCID_2020_10_activites_X.tar.gz'.You will find all the public activities under 'X/31X/0000-0002-7869-831X/' which are then sub-divided in folders for each activity type.If you are looking for all the employments that belong to '0000-0002-7869-831X': Decompress the file 'ORCID_2020_10_activites_X.tar.gz',Navigate to 'X/31X/0000-0002-7869-831X/employments'.If you are looking for the employment with put-code '7923980' that belongs to '0000-0002-7869-831X' : Decompress the file 'ORCID_2020_10_activites_X.tar.gz'.You will find that employment under 'X/31X/0000-0002-7869-831X/employments/0000-0002-7869-831X_employments_7923980.xml'.Companion Resources:https://github.com/ORCID/orcid-model/tree/master/src/main/resources/common_3.02019: File: https://doi.org/10.23640/07243.9988322.v22018 File: https://doi.org/10.23640/07243.7234028.v12017 File: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5479792.v12016 File: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.41340272015 File: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15827052014 File: http://dx.doi.org/10.14454/07243.2014.0012013 File: http://dx.doi.org/10.14454/07243.2013.001

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,296,556
of 23,474,618 outputs
Outputs from figshare
#634
of 24,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,496
of 416,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from figshare
#21
of 536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,474,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.