↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-6-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konrad Bork

Abstract

Until recently it was assumed that hereditary angioedema is a disease that results exclusively from a genetic deficiency of the C1 inhibitor. In 2000, families with hereditary angioedema, normal C1 inhibitor activity and protein in plasma were described. Since then numerous patients and families with that condition have been reported. Most of the patients by far were women. In many of the affected women, oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy containing estrogens, and pregnancies triggered the clinical symptoms. Recently, in some families mutations in the coagulation factor XII (Hageman factor) gene were detected in the affected persons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 37 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 38 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,274,254
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#216
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,582
of 103,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.