↓ Skip to main content

Distinct epidemiology and resistance mechanisms affecting ceftolozane/tazobactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from ICU patients in Spain and Portugal depicted by WGS

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct epidemiology and resistance mechanisms affecting ceftolozane/tazobactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from ICU patients in Spain and Portugal depicted by WGS
Published in
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), October 2020
DOI 10.1093/jac/dkaa430
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Hernández-García, María García-Castillo, Sergio García-Fernández, José Melo-Cristino, Margarida F Pinto, Elsa Gonçalves, Valquíria Alves, Ana Raquel Vieira, Elmano Ramalheira, Luísa Sancho, José Diogo, Rui Ferreira, Tânia Silva, Catarina Chaves, Germán Bou, Emilia Cercenado, Mercedes Delgado-Valverde, Antonio Oliver, Cristina Pitart, Jesús Rodríguez-Lozano, Nuria Tormo, João Romano, Leonor Pássaro, Laura Paixão, Diego López-Mendoza, Jazmín Díaz-Regañón, Rafael Cantón, José Melo-Cristino, Margarida F Pinto, Cristina Marcelo, Helena Peres, Isabel Lourenço, Isabel Peres, João Marques, Odete Chantre, Teresa Pina, Elsa Gonçalves, Cristina Toscano, Valquíria Alves, Manuela Ribeiro, Eliana Costa, Ana Raquel Vieira, Sónia Ferreira, Raquel Diaz, Elmano Ramalheira, Sandra Schäfer, Luísa Tancredo, Luísa Sancho, Ana Rodrigues, José Diogo, Rui Ferreira, Helena Ramos, Tânia Silva, Daniela Silva, Catarina Chaves, Carolina Queiroz, Altair Nabiev, Leonor Pássaro, Laura Paixao, João Romano, Carolina Moura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,313,304
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#834
of 8,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,988
of 440,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#15
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.