↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations From the Twitter Hashtag #DoctorsAreDickheads: Qualitative Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Internet Research, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
174 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations From the Twitter Hashtag #DoctorsAreDickheads: Qualitative Analysis
Published in
Journal of Medical Internet Research, October 2020
DOI 10.2196/17595
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anjana Estelle Sharma, Ziva Mann, Roy Cherian, Jan Bing Del Rosario, Janine Yang, Urmimala Sarkar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 174 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 34 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 33 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#302,847
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#176
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,765
of 441,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#14
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.