↓ Skip to main content

Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
59 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-01051-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Davis, Danielle D’Lima

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 27 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Psychology 6 9%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 24 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#687,887
of 21,615,008 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#97
of 1,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,998
of 399,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#12
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,615,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.