↓ Skip to main content

Adjusting the pH of lidocaine for reducing pain on injection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjusting the pH of lidocaine for reducing pain on injection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006581.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Soledad Cepeda, Aikaterini Tzortzopoulou, Michael Thackrey, Jana Hudcova, Preeti Arora Gandhi, Roman Schumann

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 38%
Engineering 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 12 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,040,953
of 20,952,692 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,571
of 12,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,092
of 396,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,952,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.