↓ Skip to main content

A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial of early intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by practice nurse-general practitioner teams: Study Protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial of early intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by practice nurse-general practitioner teams: Study Protocol
Published in
Implementation Science, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy M Bunker, Helen K Reddel, Sarah M Dennis, Sandy Middleton, CP Van Schayck, Alan J Crockett, Iqbal Hasan, Oshana Hermiz, Sanjyot Vagholkar, Guy B Marks, Nicholas A Zwar

Abstract

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a leading cause of disability, hospitalization, and premature mortality. General practice is well placed to diagnose and manage COPD, but there is a significant gap between evidence and current practice, with a low level of awareness and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Under-diagnosis of COPD is a world-wide problem, limiting the benefit that could potentially be achieved through early intervention strategies such as smoking cessation, dietary advice, and exercise. General practice is moving towards more structured chronic disease management, and the increasing involvement of practice nurses in delivering chronic care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Georgia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 218 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 16%
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 59 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 19%
Psychology 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 66 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2013.
All research outputs
#13,871,657
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,456
of 1,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,247
of 169,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.